Upper Deck settles lawsuit with MLBP

Well, I have to say this whole thing worked out much quicker and more cleanly than I would have imagined.  I’m a little surprised that Upper Deck didn’t see it out and try to fight the claims made by MLBP, but when you get down to it, it actually makes sense in a weird way.  I guess they decided they wanted to stay in business a little longer after all.  Here are the terms of the settlement, as known to the public, in case you haven’t seen them yet.

– Upper Deck will pay MLB Properties more than $2.4 million (the entire amount in dispute) for Upper Deck’s 2009 debts.
– Upper Deck will pay MLB Properties a substantial sum of money for the unlicensed cards it sold in 2010. The specific sum of that payment is confidential.
– Upper Deck has agreed not to issue any additional releases of infringing cards. Last year it issued 15 baseball card releases and there are currently only three infringing releases that are in distribution in 2010.
– Upper Deck agreed it will not make any new sets of cards using MLB logos, uniforms, trade dress, or Club color combinations.
– Upper Deck also agreed it will not airbrush, alter or block MLB marks in future products.
– Upper Deck must receive approval from MLB for the use of baseball jerseys, pants, jackets, caps, helmets or catcher’s equipment in future products featuring players.

The biggest one to me is the second from the bottom.  They aren’t even allowed to airbrush game photos anymore.  That’s like UN-un-licensed (yeah, I know…double negative, but you get what I’m trying to say).  Unnnnnlicensed.

So, where does Upper Deck go from here?  Well, I guess the first question really should be “how likely is it that Upper Deck will adhere to this agreement?”  That’s a tough call.  MLBP already knows that UD isn’t the kind to play fair.  They’re also not the type to pay up.  Will another piece of paper really get them to pay the money this time?  I wouldn’t be totally shocked to see another suit filed for failure to pay.

Aside from the monetary aspect, Upper Deck also has a well-documented history of cheating and lying and conducting their business in an under-handed and illegal manner.  Let’s say Series 2 comes out and it’s more of the same.  What will happen?  The product will get out into the public with the alleged copyright infringement just as it did the first time.  Collectors will eat it up because they think it’ll get pulled off the shelves quickly (and it most likely wouldn’t get pulled quickly enough to make a secondary market difference – although maybe the settlement would prompt a judge to allow an emergency injunction).  Upper Deck will get pulled back into court again and most likely face another settlement.

Why would Upper Deck do this?  Well…for the same reason they did it the first time.  Relatively little damage for the potential for a greater reward.  Upper Deck didn’t produce those cards because they honestly felt they were safe copyright-wise.  If that was the case, they wouldn’t have hid their product images before release and they wouldn’t have made and effort to hide the logos as much as they did.  No, they produced them because they knew the controversy would boost sales to a level greater than if they released a safe product.  I can only imagine that Upper Deck drew some non-collector dollars from those people hoping to get the possibly illegal cards before they went away.  It’s a matter of any publicity is good publicity.  Topps had the Million Card Giveaway and Upper Deck could only still compete by making news of their own.  The fact that their news made it seem like their cards were something to grab sooner than later — was a good decision in a messed-up roundabout way.  Doing it all a second time would be a greater financial risk however, because they have something filed saying they wouldn’t and would conceivably face stiffer penalties.

I got away from the question.  Where do they go from here?  Well, hopefully they get creative with it.  You don’t need live action shots to have a successful product.  You don’t even need pictures.  Topps National Chicle and Topps Magic Football show that.  Or Mayo.  Goudy and Goodwin can be done sans logo, easily.  Here’s another suggestion:


I know the Gwynn has a uniform, but when I think about Studio as a brand, I don’t remember that aspect.  I remember the High School Senior picture goodness with the clubs and most likely to’s and the favorites, etc.  Maybe Panini would be mad, but change it up enough and they should be fine.  Or maybe they won’t change it at all.  It is Upper Deck we’re talking about after all.


fu-fu-fun paaaaaack

Use this opportunity to market to kids withOUT counterfeiting this time.  Bring back Fun Packs.  Bust out Collector’s Choice.  Give us low-price options with silly drawings and stickers and whatever else.  Try to nab a cartoon license again, if you don’t have one, and put more Comic Ball out.  I’m not going to say that kids don’t care about a licensed card, but you can get away with a lot more odd-ball, non-licensed stuff in a product geared towards children.  Why try to battle Topps head-on with most of their releases?  Aggressively seek out this market, because Topps is leaving you an opening here, and success here can save your business.

What do you guys think?  Am I totally off base?  What else could they do to really differentiate themselves?

6 comments to Upper Deck settles lawsuit with MLBP

  • “What else could they do to really differentiate themselves?”

    Well, to differentiate themselves from the way they behaved up until this point they can actually play by the rules and not be the dodgy, unscrupulous pricks that they have been for the last 20 years.

  • I agree with most everything you said. It’s the “UD is evil because they…” stuff that bugs me. Yeah, they did do that stuff, but other companies aren’t wearing white cowboy hats either.

    I had a very similar post to yours written up for my blog, but I couldn’t push the button. I made a promise recently to ignore industry news, views, and rumor as so many other blogs do it better than I can (you did a great job). Besides, being mult-facted, my blog is a different monster.

    ANYWAY… I can still comment. 😛

    UD has a great opportunity here to turn this into a plus for their business and the hobby. Panini/Donruss gets along fine with Elite. ITG does amazing stuff without a hockey license. UD could outshine both (well, hard to outshine ITG…) very easily. They need to be creative, yes, but they also need to be smart now. Now is not the time to fight the system – they already failed that. If they do this right, UD will find themselves atop the hobby with quality product and outsell the heck out of Topps (as I fear Topps will get lazier because they have the exclusive license). I just hope UD (AND Topps) see the opportunity here to impress us collectors. We need to be impressed. Otherwise the hobby will suffer greatly.

    (Just a note, I haven’t met a card company I’ve ever disliked, so don’t see this as Topps bashing. Topps is only at fault with bad releases, not this exclusive deal… MLBP handed that to them and fought this war.)

  • I think it’s fair to call your blog multi-facted as well as multi-faceted!

    To Alex’s point, I’m behind you 100%- everyone should paly by the rules so there’s a level playing field. But “the rules” don’t sit well with me to begin with when “the rules” are monopolization. Yeah, I know UD isn’t exactly a scrappy go-getter trying to tie up the legs of Topps’ rebel base-crushing AT-AT (I’m aware that there was nothing good about that shoehorned reference), but Topps is veering toward The Empire status these days (I can’t stop! Andrew, draw a satirical comic strip using these ideas!) so it’s hard to not want someone to step up. Topps’ new exclusive USA baseball license (coupled with their already-exclusive MiLB license) basically guarantees that no casual collector will have a chance at determining what an actual rookie card is and that bothers me WAY more than UD blowing off the MLB’s copyright agreement. Yeah, it’s within the rules… but lots of things that suck are within the rules.

    Basically, I feel like there are no good guys here. No one is looking out for the collectors’ interests and why should they? People buy all level of terrible sportscard product despite all the ridiculous BS going on behind the scenes. Until the companies get hit in their wallets, nothing will change. And unless we stop buying Ultimate, UD base, Bowman, Bowman Draft and boycott whatever godawful MiLB products Topps releases this year, we’re all digging our own graves (graves to be filled in with worthless base cards. It’s 1989 all over again! Anarchy! Revolt!).

    And on a completely unrelated note, stay tuned for our Topps Heritage review!

  • Man, that is almost worth drawing.

  • […] … Your avatar will show with all of your comments. If you don't want one here, we also can …Upper Deck settles lawsuit with MLBP Community GumLast year it issued 15 baseball card releases and there are currently only three … Topps had the […]

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>